Thats definitely not Emma Frost. Too skinny. We all know that comic book women are supposed to be hot. They got it right with black widow in Iron Man 2. I dont think I ever heard anyone brag about how fine the X-women are from the films beside the obviously naked mystique which was just a distraction from the actual crappy plots of the films. After four ridiculously cheaply made X-men movies, I think its safe to say this one wont fair any better.

Xcuse me EZ but that is definitley the way she looks like emma frost that is the way i m looking at her character photo and she is looks like her origindley so much of her o yes that,s the one

infact dont get me wrong but i seened her photo of emma frost picture so she is definetley her emma frost she is to skinny dont get me wrong but she is her i know her ive seen her to many times and she is definetley her o yes

That hat looks dumb as hell on her.

This looks terrible. Not to mention the fact that Emma Frost was a fetus in the 60s. And Emma Grace Frost would not be caught DEAD in that hat. Kelly Carlson would’ve made a much more convincing Emma.

that stunt double is rubbish 1. her hat is adifferent size 2. her tights are a different colour and her hair is a different length and colour ….come on big budget and cutting corners

“That hat look stupid”
IT’S SET IN THE 60s!!! WOW! Apparently people think people have always worn skinny jeans and wife beaters. Different era, different fashion. And that certainly was fashionable in the 60s (though it seems a bit more early 70s with the cut). Emma Frost is nothing if not fashionable.

cyber x learn to spell

I think she looks like Emma Frost from the era of Mad Men.

Who the hell is January Jones? Indy’s aneorexic baby sister?

I’m pissed off about the whole X-Men franchise of movies. First they edit out my favorite characters Gambit. And make Bobby Drake and Rogue fall in love. I’m pretty sure Iceman was more of a sarcastic character that tried to be a ladies man, but never was attached to anyone for very long. And the Wolverine movie was just terrible. I don’t see any reason that this movie would be any better. That being said I think the brightest thing from these X-Men movies is that they casted two roles correctly. Kelsey Grammer as Beast and Patrick Stewart as Professor X. The the others they casted weren’t up to snuff. And Gambit was a major player and it’s sad to see him shunned like this.

Somebody buy that bag o’ bones a cheezboiger!

First. I highly doubt the “budget” for this movie has anything to do with the decision to use a particular $50 hat and a pair of $20 tights. Second…we already know this movie is completely revisionist. Third. Get her the white leather bodice we all know and love damnit.

This has singer written all over it …horrific.

This is another superman returns or worse, X2

Take off that dumba** hat and show some cleavage like in the cartoons and comics

wow looks 60′s kitchy wear to me. Besides emma was introduced in the 70′s and would be like 40 or so in the 2000 cause she’s like 20ish in the 70′s. And jean and scott in the real world would now be like 40 or 50 too. come on guys its comic book time versus real time. Get over it. Looks great to me.

I’d have to agree with a few of the comments, that she’s a bit thin for this part. She should be more robust and sultry looking. Definitely a cuckoo candidate. Let’s see if she’s got the attitude to pull it off.

Wait, she’s supposed to be attractive? Ugh. As far as looking like Emma Frost, she couldn’t look less the part if she dyed her hair green.

No, it’s NOT the Emma Frost we see in the comics today, these are those characters as TEENS. Remember, it’s a PREquel I think the movie itself takes place in the mid-sixties.

Gom. Seriously dude? Since when has changing comic continuity for a movie ever spelled doom for it? I don’t think I’ve seen a single comic based movie that didn’t change some or many things to fit into the cinematic mold. Characters ages in the comics (which are always left quite ambiguous for a reason) are the least of these things. Frankly, those who decry the changes in comic book to movie continuity always annoy me. It’s simply too difficult to properly translate 30-50 years of continuity into a 2 hour film. For those comic geeks (like me) just think of this movie taking place in an alternate reality. This is not the 616 X-Men. Okay?

My big problem is not maintaining continuity within one’s own film franchise.

My understanding is that X-Men 1-3, the Wolverine movie(s) and X-Men: First Class are all supposed to be directly linked to one another.

So, why was Kitty Pryde played by 3 different actresses in 3 back-to-back-to-back films? Why was her age never consistent? Why is Emma Frost being played by a different actress in X-Men: First Class than she was in Wolverine? Why is James McAvoy playing professor X in the film instead of a de-aged Patrick Stewart as he did at the end of Wolverine (the first time he meets Scott Summers and Emma Frost)?

All of these things bother me more than discontinuities from the comic.

i think she looks fantastic, the film is set in the 60′s plus she is outside in these shots. SHUT UP YOU STUPID JERK PETER BOXALL

They screwed up the entire X-MAN series from day one. The first X-Men were cyclops, beast, ice-man, marvel girl, Angel. In the movies they had Wolverine TRAINING X-men who, in the comics, were in charge of training HIM! It’s been ridiculous, the whole ice-man Rogue romance would have sent Bobby to jail for statutory rape, Then they put Gambit in the wolverine X-men PREquel making him older than angel? So, it doesn’t much surprise me that they are CONTINUING to screw this whole marvel sideline up beyond recognition. I just hope it doesn’t hurt the other Marvel lines being brought out. As for the white queen seen above: I have to agree (a little less vitriolically) with EZ. Women today could use role models that are healthier than this twig. As for marvel movies that follow the comics, I loved the ones that did, but, nobody else seemed to have, ie; Daredevil, Punisher (NOT THE DOLPH LUNDGREN FIASCO!!!!), Ghost Rider and Fantastic Four. Although, the Fan 4 seemed to get pretty good reviews.

Yep I agree they are destroying X-MAN. But in the X-men they are creating a whole new continuity not following old bases. Im not defending the BS continuity in the movies Im just saying First class has the oppourtunity to fix this. You can suck on ur angel all u want but do u know how old Gambit really is. white Queen/ EF has never had “baby back” so lets ixnay that as well. c’mon are you telling me ur a crybaby fan boy? Smh. They’re making the film alright- stop complaining please. all u bitch-ass fanboys need to realize a comic is a series of events. To make a movie is a singular event. A standard universe of movies is based on trilogies. What I mean if ur not following is that by making a movie you are creating a new universe only to accomplish one event in a series. therefore why they smush heroes and villans in every movie. Its wealth is based on its adaptation and direction. Xmen 1 fairly well, 2 alright, 3 slightly insane. But its bad direction. Nuff said.